It’s a 3d printing forum, most people here already have the 3d Printer for other uses. It’s an option for those people. Not someone who is starting from scratch.

Apparently the entire site copy was just a gpt marketing buzzword vomit with no substance.

They’d need Access to the suspect’s printer, to print more copies for comparison in order to tell, though, from how the article describes it.

Similar to how they match bullets to the gun that fired it. It’s not like it prints a serial number QR code on it or anything

Nah, that would give the idiot an easy excuse to invade.

Given that DOGE has already wasted $500 billion…I didn’t think they’ll care

All intelligence was removed as part of the DOGE cuts.

Given how big a security leak the dipshit is, and he already got a ton of their agents in the field killed the first time around, it’s not so much them caring about the US, but then seeing a threat to their own power.

And red voters will still find ways to deny that he’s Putin’s little bitch boy

deleted by creator

Russian asset says what

Funny joke, but California’s economy is waaaay bigger than Denmark’s. CA is like the 5th largest in the world. Denmark is like 37.

Well this has been previously tested.

“More likely” would imply frequency of false information to overall tweets. Which would be split by political leaning already. The numbers of each side wouldn’t matter much in that case

Right wing once again proving they’re the real snowflakes.

Not even gonna try to pretend it isn’t ethnic cleansing…

Hyperlink which went to a different article. Do you not understand how the Internet works? Don’t act like you weren’t wrong when you failed to clarify properly. That’s not on me

So…not in the article, but in a completely different linked article. Got it

The word laser does not appear once in this article.

Where’s it say they used a laser to transfer the information? This sounded like quantum entanglement was being demonstrated here

You keep acting like votes mean permission to break the law. Our that people who generally don’t pay attention to politics would be fine with someone they didn’t vote for it against breaking the law. This is a dipshit logical stance to take. So pretending you’re not the store one here when you try to say idiotic shit like this. Like did you think this through in your head?

Yes, I keep bringing it up because you boot lickers love to ignore the context of everything you argue about. Abstraction is the only chance you have at winning an argument against such an obviously one sided discussion.