What does Marxism have to do with not focusing your attention on one thing at a time? This would be an issue only if Netflix was somehow forcing you to only have 1 screen on at once to force you to pay attention to their content. But not a social economic issue.

I’d say since angels are imaginary, √-1 angels would fit on a pin head.

At least you laid out some actual facts here, not just believe me bro it’s a conspiracy.

Still flimsy assumptions here.

Just as much reason to assume he snapped and acted independently as a loner like you described and is the normal mo for assassins in the past. And that SS is still has gaps in their security.

Didn’t realize the facts of how things played out would be considered a contrived story.

But if you believe conspiracies… Not too surprising that’s what you think

What is so hard to believe about someone acting on their own beliefs to try to kill one of the most hated and divisive people in our present time in history.

Or why is it hard to believe that the SS failed in their duty to actively protect the president or president elect. Not like that hasn’t happened in US history ever. (Regan, Kennedy, Lincoln…).

Easier to believe the conspiracy I guess.

I believe in facts, not assumed narratives.

I shared above how things played out.

Until any facts come out about SS or other groups plots to conspire to fake an attempt on Trump, I will believe that this person acted by themselves and actually tried to kill Trump for their own reasons. And failed, killing others on accident, and getting himself killed in the process.

Crazy to assume otherwise.

There is no proof of what you say. Therefore it is unfounded.

You can make your own false assumptions, but spreading conspiracy theories like this is dangerous.

Unequivocally my ass

Can’t disagree

Scary stuff

Did you!? Then stop spreading shit!

This is just dumb conspiracy theory shit.

Bullet trajectory showed Trump would be dead if he didn’t turn his head last minute. That slight turn allowed the bullet only to glance his ear. That same bullet then hit some in the crowd behind him. He then fliched a bit, and the other shots that were still aimed at the initial first spot all missed and hit the crowd behind him.

There is such a slim chance that was all planned. Trump was directly in line of fire and could have easily been killed if this was just a stunt. They’d never risk that.

Don’t spread shit rumors in a time when there is plenty of real shit in front of your eyes to be angry about.

I mean this is a good idea, but the opposite of the question stated. Are there no think tanks to implement liberal solutions as opposed to stopping or fixing conservatives policies.

Why can’t we scheme as well as conservatives?

They settle right next to existing Palestinian towns. Then surround them by expanding. Create better infrastructure. Then exclude the Palestinians and ensure they are treat as other or not equal.

Well said. This is a very complicated subject that people always try to simplify down to a current issue at hand. There’s never a true “right” answer, and isn’t one that leaves all parties without some suffering.

Ok, but that’s for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.

In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they’d be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.

How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.

How would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?

And if it’s just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?

I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn’t we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.

Maybe it’s the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.

More democratic this way

This is a bunch of pipe cleaners tied together. A bit less risky, more Ridgid than just string