• rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Agree. But that specific article seems pretty alright. Also talks about the relics and history records for example by Tacitus.

    There also is a Wikipedia article which I think is not written that well. And a lot of education material by churches or religious organizations which I did not cite for obvious reasons.

    (And the German Wikipedia article about sources for the historicity of Jesus seems very good. But it’s not exactly OP’s question and I don’t know if it helps: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Außerchristliche_antike_Quellen_zu_Jesus_von_Nazaret )

    • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      There also is a Wikipedia article which I think is not written that well. And a lot of education material by churches or religious organizations which I did not cite for obvious reasons.

      That’s because Christian apologists constantly brigade those articles.

      Edit: lol, and downvote lemmy comments I guess