mondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoA new trolley eralemmy.worldimagemessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imageA new trolley eralemmy.worldmondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square154fedilink
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down20·1 year agoCan always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
minus-squareAeroLemming@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoThe idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
minus-squareSeducingCamel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoSo we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoFact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp
minus-squareNuclearDolphin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agostoopid tankie, getting high on sources
Can always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
deleted by creator
The idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
So we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
Fact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp
stoopid tankie, getting high on sources