I plugged into ethernet (as wifi w/captive portal does not work for me). I think clearnet worked but I have no interest in that. Egress Tor traffic was blocked and so was VPN. I’m not interested in editing all my scripts and configs to use clearnet, so the library’s internet is useless to me (unless I bother to try a tor bridge).

I was packing my laptop and a librarian spotted me unplugging my ethernet cable and approached me with big wide open eyes and pannicked angry voice (as if to be addressing a child that did something naughty), and said “you can’t do that!”

I have a lot of reasons for favoring ethernet, like not carrying a mobile phone that can facilitate the SMS verify that the library’s captive portal imposes, not to mention I’m not eager to share my mobile number willy nilly. The reason I actually gave her was that that I run a free software based system and the wifi drivers or firmware are proprietary so my wifi card doesn’t work¹. She was also worried that I was stealing an ethernet cable and I had to explain that I carry an ethernet cable with me, which she struggled to believe for a moment. When I said it didn’t work, she was like “good, I’m not surprised”, or something like that.

¹ In reality, I have whatever proprietary garbage my wifi NIC needs, but have a principled objection to a service financed by public money forcing people to install and execute proprietary non-free software on their own hardware. But there’s little hope for getting through to a librarian in the situation at hand, whereby I might as well have been caught disassembling their PCs.

  • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    When I entered I spoke to a different librarian about the locked PC room (due to a holiday or something). They said I could use wifi but need to give a phone number to a captive portal, which I already knew. My phone was not on me so I said: is it okay if I plug in over there by the catalog PCs? They said yes. Revealing what I mean by "plugging in”, well, i was vague for a reason. I know the population has become ethernet-hostile¹ so indeed asking for forgiveness is better than asking for permission in this situation.

    ¹ Another library in the area has ethernet ports but they are just decoys (dead ports). I asked the librarian what the problem is, why they are disabled, and whether we can turn them on. Librarian was helpless, and said “use wifi”, which didn’t work for me for different reasons than the other library. But the librarian basically said in so many words “not our problem… you can just use wifi.” At another library, I was able to connect but Tor was blocked. I tried to get support from the librarian. They had no clue but were also unwilling to lead me to someone who could give support. The way it works around here is the info systems are outsourced to some unreachable tech giant, and the librarians are rendered helpless. If the SSID does not appear, the librarian can send an email to someone to say it’s down, and that’s about the full extent of their tech capability.

    • mark3748@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      6 months ago

      Another library in the area has ethernet ports but they are just decoys (dead ports). I asked the librarian what the problem is, why they are disabled, and whether we can turn them on.

      They’re not decoys, they’re just not patched. Because we don’t generally patch anything that’s not going to be in use. Also because some rando will probably attempt to plug their nasty ass laptop into it, which is also why we block port intrusions.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re not decoys, they’re just not patched.

        Equipment isn’t free, after all, especially if you’re a library.

    • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why didn’t you tell this librarian that you’d asked another librarian and they said it was okay to plug in? Why was none of this included in the original post?

      • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The librarian who said it was okay to plugin (which they likely understood to mean plugin an A/C power cord) was young, not as senior as the edgy librarian. I’m not going to take down a kid and get them in trouble for not picking apart what it means when someone asks if they can “plug-in”.

        People like Trump will throw his supporters under the bus when self-defense calls for it. I will not.

        What would the point be? I didn’t need a defense. I got scolded and was walking out. Since I was calm, the librarian became calm. Police were not called and I was not detained. And if that had happened, I would have exercised my right to remain silent anyway.

        • Twinklebreeze @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You sound insufferable. You used vague wording to justify not using your phone to get internet, and act like child when you get caught. They’re not hostile to Ethernet, they’re hostile to you and your behaviour.

          • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You set a great example of getting mad at a bitch eating crackers.

            I merely tried to get online using an ethernet cable. I didn’t get hostile. I was calm. And because I was calm, the librarian became calm. The only hostility was in the librarian’s single opening comment to me, and what you see in this thread.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Could I be in the wrong? No, it must be literally everyone else in this entire thread / national library network.

              Grow up. You set out to get in trouble, you got yourself in trouble, no one is impressed.

              • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Could I be in the wrong? No, it must be literally everyone else in this entire thread / national library network.

                Is your position so weak that you need to resort to a bandwagon fallacy?

                Grow up.

                and an ad hominem?

                You demonstrate being a grown up by avoiding ad hominems in favor of logically sound reasoning.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Is your position so weak that you need to resort to a bandwagon fallacy?

                  It’s not a fallacy. Your social skills are toxic and that’s been confirmed by everyone here. You aren’t in a position to judge how your actions are perceived by society.

                  If everyone says you’re being an asshole, you’re being an asshole.

                  and an ad hominem?

                  This isn’t a formal debate. It’s me and everyone else booing you for your bad behavior.

      • kernelle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know right? Everyone cheering them on, meanwhile I’m reading the OP and find them to be pretentious and maladjusted. Who talks about the ‘clearnet’ like it’s the internet of normies?