Thoughts? I am currently trying to avoid using plastic packed drinks as much as possible due to it’s limited and finite recycle count

    • cobra89@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      They already do in the US, they sell beer like this. And I’m pretty sure I’ve seen water packaged like this too.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Compared to barrels of crude oil, I am sure a SINGLE Block of Aluminium can be reused more than 1000X times with no environment damage.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh I’m sure you are right, it’s the drink companies for whom the shipping expense outweighs the environmental damage, because capitalism.

          • Ptsf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s also worth noting that transport does not have a zero cost on the environment. It’s why we did away with glass, it’s so heavy it actually becomes carbon intensive to transport. Especially when you account for greater spoilage percentages (due to the glass being mishandled and breaking more often than alternatives). The equation isn’t as simple as it would seem. The true solution is less likely single use drink containers of any kind and more likely some sort of reusable bottle you carry around with you and could fill up.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Capitalism could solve this no problem if we just taxed externalities. Don’t even have to hit every level of the supply chain, just a big tax on fossil carbon removed from the ground, and maybe another tax where it gets transformed into plastic (a sort of externality-added tax).

            The market then decided what’s still worth making and what’s not, based on the total cost including the new taxes, weighed against how much people are willing to pay for the stuff.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m curious how much the environmental costs of shipping products in aluminum containers v. lighter plastic containers changes the equation.

            I also tend to think that an even better solution would be to have the consumer be the one with the container, and shipping the product in bulk, to be dispensed as a bulk item at a retail location. E.g., the packaging for shipping is the tank that the truck is towing, rather than a trailer full of individual use bottles.

            • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Besides convenience, I think a lot of container waste is also caused by our litigious society. If you pour milk into my container and I later sue you because it makes me sick, you might decide your best defense is to sell all milk in sealed containers. (And if someone poisons some containers, you’ll add tamper-proof layers.)