Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 年前Biden signs TikTok “ban” bill into law, starting the clock for ByteDance to divest itwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up195arrow-down10
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkBiden signs TikTok “ban” bill into law, starting the clock for ByteDance to divest itwww.theverge.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 年前message-square39fedilink
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 年前Tiktok has been a subject of national security concerns since at least 2020.
minus-squareFacebones@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 年前With absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 年前Well, no. The courts struck down Trump’s Tiktok ban because he used an executive order that overstepped his authority.
minus-squareFacebones@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前Because executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn’t exist. You’re only backing my argument lmao.
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前That’s the opposite of what the court said.
Tiktok has been a subject of national security concerns since at least 2020.
With absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.
Well, no. The courts struck down Trump’s Tiktok ban because he used an executive order that overstepped his authority.
Because executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn’t exist. You’re only backing my argument lmao.
That’s the opposite of what the court said.