Cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/12956314

"I push back on doomism because I don’t think it’s justified by the science, and I think it potentially leads us down a path of inaction,” said Mann during a talk last Thursday at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

“And there are bad actors today who are fanning the flames of climate doomism because they understand that it takes those who are most likely to be on the front lines, advocating for change, and pushes them to the sidelines, which is where polluters and petrostates want them.”

  • Jimmybander@champserver.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Accepting this notion I feel like the best thing to do is to harden and make more resilient our ability to survive the extreme weather and tenperatures coming. If we can survive on Mars or whatever we can survive on a warmer Earth.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      We as a species will survive global warming, assuming the societal collapse doesn’t lead to nuclear armageddon.

      We as average people typically will not.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Many people who do reproduce will likely see their children die, which is why many will not reproduce

        • Zworf@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Which on its own will help to mitigate the problem. This is why it’s not an extinction event.

          It’s just that it’s not really a very good “solution” because of all the misery it causes.