• Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Perhaps not exactly what you’re asking but one thing many religious people don’t seem to get is that they’re “atheists” aswell when it comes to all the other gods out there. The difference to atheism is that we just don’t believe in their god either.

    I don’t know how many gods there are but for the sake of an argument, lets say 500. A Christian believes in 1 out of 500 gods and an atheist believes in 0 out of 500. We’re not that different from each other after all.

      • digehode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s what they’re saying. An atheist believes in 0 of the total options for gods and religions that you get if you add them all up. A believer believes in 1 or a few of them. So really, the religious are also non-believers when it comes to most gods and religions.

        • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not sure about that. It takes a pretty big leap to go from believing in 0 gods to 1. I think the line dividing atheists from theists is a pretty huge rift because they hold opposing views on very fundamental matters like the concept of God itself, how the world came to be, our purpose in life, what happens after we die… I don’t think it’s something you can quite reduce down to a matter of numbers.

          • digehode@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, I agree. I was just trying to clarify the intent of the comment.

            But also I think that’s the point of that line of debate. It is an attempt to show a religious stance from an atheist perspective in which belief is a while load of possible strange things accepted as true. It’s not really much use other than when you’re faced with someone who things your lack of theism is the opposite of their particular brand of religion and frames the discussion around which bits you have issue with, as if they might prove to you that you’re wrong. Or to show that their belief that their religion is correct and all the others, including atheism, are the wrong ones, isn’t really the other side of what an atheist thinks.

            More a thought experiment than meant to characterise the entirety of atheism.

            • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Sure, but only as far as science doesn’t contradict their religious beliefs. For example, there are many Creationist Christians who reject Evolution, Natural Selection and the Big Bang.

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further. - Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Richard “eugenics is good, actually” Dawkins

        Keep it classy, liberal-fascist beehaw.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That was part of the reason I became an atheist, to remove the hypocrisy and believe in all gods equally. I still believe in all gods equally, but am no longer an atheist.