A loud minority of Texans call for Independence, which is not really possible as far as I know, BUT could the Rest of the USA just kick another state (Not necessary Texas) out? Or is this also not possible?

  • kirklennon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    it is worded incredibly clearly and explicitly as a prohibition

    And yet it’s inherently non-operative. I’m unconcerned with how it was intended since that’s totally irrelevant to what it actually is.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If, as you say,

      I’m unconcerned with how it was intended since that’s totally irrelevant to what it actually is.

      Then why did you waste time describing what you believed was the intention behind it earlier when you said,

      I think of it as a rhetorical flourish to emphasize the importance they placed on representing states rather than people.

      Regardless, the other point that I made that you haven’t addressed still stands: they put that prohibition against banning the slave trade in there for a reason, and that reason was presumably not “as a rhetorical flourish”, so either the people who insisted that it be present were horribly incompetent at writing legal language that would preserve their own interests, or your personal opinion as to how Constitutional law works in this case is missing something important.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Then why did you waste time describing what you believed was the intention behind it earlier when you said

        I never said that was the intention. I said that’s what I think of it as. In practice all it does is underline a point. These same people also totally screwed up how we chose the president and vice president and failed to provide a proper mechanism for replacing a dead president.

        horribly incompetent at writing legal language

        Horribly incompetent? No. Flawless, or even particularly prescient? No. They got a lot of big stuff right; they got a whole lot wrong.

        • bitcrafter@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Horribly incompetent? No. Flawless, or even particularly prescient? No. They got a lot of big stuff right; they got a whole lot wrong.

          So just to be clear: you think that this particular language was badly written because it is so easily bypassed?