I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don’t know why.

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

    We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

    If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

    • DeadPand@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early…

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’ve got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

        Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.