sag@lemm.ee to cats@lemmy.world · 1 year agoProtesting for tunalemm.eeimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down19
arrow-up1741arrow-down1imageProtesting for tunalemm.eesag@lemm.ee to cats@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareTimwi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoThose are all fair points. Still unfortunate that it’s still down to money even in your explanation, but it makes sense.
minus-squareNoel_Skum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoYeah. Good point. I should’ve explicitly said in a final sentence that the decision ultimately comes down to protecting / increasing shareholder profit and management bonuses; and nothing else.
Those are all fair points. Still unfortunate that it’s still down to money even in your explanation, but it makes sense.
Yeah. Good point. I should’ve explicitly said in a final sentence that the decision ultimately comes down to protecting / increasing shareholder profit and management bonuses; and nothing else.