• yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The argument was not whether fixed cost exceed the variable cost or vice versa.

      The argument was that a lot of people severely underestimate the actual cost of any given trip because they only account for (a subset of) the variable costs (i.e. gas).

      And it’s true. Rarely anyone does full costing when it comes to cars because „the fixed cost are there no matter how much you drive“.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @yA3xAKQMbq

        @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

        the argument in this thread has been about if fixed vs variable costs where more. I fully agree cars are expensive no matter how you do the math, and most people underestimate it (in part by only considering gas). However I stand by my claim that once you have the car you may as well use it as the additional variable costs from all optional trips is tiny (I’m assuming that you have the car for some purpose that cannot be done by something else - towing the proverbial boat for example).