• ira@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m curious why you think ocean microplastics can stick around for a few more decades or centuries

    • Tak@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Even if we ignore microplastics, steel wheels on rail are significantly more efficient than tires. Rail is just better unless you are going to places not traveled much.

      • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I was gonna argue that rolling resistance doesn’t have a large impact on efficiency, but apparently I was wrong

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance

        An example of a very light high-speed passenger train is the N700 Series Shinkansen, which weighs 715 tonnes and carries 1323 passengers, resulting in a per-passenger weight of about half a tonne. This lighter weight per passenger, combined with the lower rolling resistance of steel wheels on steel rail means that an N700 Shinkansen is much more energy efficient than a typical automobile.

        • Tak@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s really counter intuitive to how we think of rolling resistance.

          https://piped.video/watch?v=tfA0ftgWI7U

          This video helped explain to me how the material the wheels are made of does impact the rolling resistance because the wheel deforms.