• Shayeta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Steam has the exact same setup, you don’t own anything there either. It is all perpetual limited licenses. The only difference is that Steam has so far kept up the illusion of ownership.

    This should be legally disallowed, “Buy” means ownership.

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think as long as everyone acts in good faith, it’s not an issue.

      If you truly did own your games on Steam, then you might have legal grounds to sue over something as silly as server downtime.

      Furthermore, if you outright threatened Valve staff or something, ownership would mean they would be unable to ban your account.

      I’m not claiming this as fact and I could be wrong but not even GOG let’s you ‘buy’ games; just games without DRM?

      • Shayeta@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 minutes ago

        Having games on your disk without DRM. That IS ownership. There are ways for Steam to make it so customers own games, but it is not in their best interest to do so.

        Valve is not very different from any other company. The only difference is that since Valve is privately owned they can afford to make long-term plans, unlike publicly traded companies which have a fiduciary responsibility to chase profits every quarter.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are both correct. I’ll usually double buy my favourites. One of steam early on, especially for Linux compatibility ease, then on gog years later on sale.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes ypu do and ypu can run them offline outside of the steam launcher. Not the same as cloud games