• ulterno@programming.devEnglish
    17·
    22 hours ago

    AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
    At least better than the type of human CEOs that decide to go full AI.

      • ulterno@programming.devEnglish
        1·
        3 hours ago

        Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn’t even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.

        The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zoneEnglish
      8·
      19 hours ago

      Probably not, AI CEOs will be trained on data from how real CEOs work … so AI CEOs will make all the same problems, with all the same gas lighting that they are doing a great job. Also the AI CEOs will be provided by megacorp models so you just know they will be biased to benefit the owner mega corp over all else.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        1·
        16 hours ago

        But they won’t be trained on just human CEO data and that means they will easily be better. I think we should guillotine all CEOs and replace them with AI for a trial run for science and all that.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zoneEnglish
          3·
          15 hours ago

          Sure, why not? We should probably do shareholders at the same time, they seem to be the ones forcing the CEOs to make such great decisions …

    • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      7·
      20 hours ago

      The trouble with that, I feel, may lie in the subtle differences between

      • the CEO kind of psychopath: batshit unplugged for sure, no contest; just enough to make fucktons of money for far too few people, but not too cracked that they blow everything up, instead…

      • and, any given bot’s penchant for going off the fucking’ rails in record time, every time —which, unless you short the whole thing, makes the opposite of money.

      🤭