• flabberjabber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Much of education is based on following a rational thought through to its conclusion regardless of age.

    I’m confused as to why the idea of teaching a logical subject is up for debate. Kids are taught math and science early and through logical foundations.

    Education is built on logic! Yes, by all means wrap that boring unemotional logic up in a shiny emotional wrapper. That makes sense. That’s the sign of a great teacher or a great curriculum or materials. But in that is the difference of delivery versus content.

    From Ancient Greece to modern times - logic is something that still persists in education because the universe we live in is a logical rules based one. It might be boring, and not very engaging to some, not emotive enough, but it is neccessary.

    In the UK kids are taught a basic version of the scientific method between the age of 5-7 years old according to the UK goverenment website. Should they scrap that because it’s not naturally emotive?

    Respectfully, your point seems to be a moot one. Criticising delivery, when I was talking about the subject matter and delivery is as much a skill of those delivering as anything else.