I know it already is but should it be?

  • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “At all” is kinda contradictory part. Limiting harm to others would already necessitate limiting freedoms and the more people and closer together they live the more freedoms are limited.

    Living in the middle of nowhere and a person can do almost whatever pops in their mind, almost absolute freedom.

    Living in a city and there’s a long list of laws/rules/regulations that already limit what one can do. Not that those are bad limitations.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Individuals should not limit other’s freedom, and as such the law can restrict individual freedoms to that purpose.