Would it make a difference if the laws of physics prevent or allow a machine from operating in ‘duplicate’ mode?

      • SmokeInFog@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thank you, came here to say this. People like the phrase “continuity of consciousness” but the problem of persistent identity is much more fundamental than this thought experiment lets on

    • SpicyAnt@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      What if:

      1. It is physically impossible to make a copy
      2. Your family and friends use it daily
      • Foxfire@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Different person but:

        1. I am concerned about continuity of consciousness, not about copies. From an earlier comment posted, you mention disintegration and reintegration. If we’re just transcribing the data into new atoms on the other side, continuity of consciousness will not transfer over. Well, to be more precise, the individual on the other side will believe it has, and to the rest of the world I will be functionally the exact same being. This doesn’t matter to me though, because my specific consciousness no longer exists. If we’re actually using the exact same atoms after disintegration, I couldn’t tell you if that would work. I sure as shit wouldn’t be trying it though.

        2. My family and friends do things daily I am not interested in, including things which they find to be convenient or important to their daily lives. I’ll be fine, but I also wouldn’t bother stopping them either. From my perspective, their original continuity of consciousness is irrelevant to me. They will live, feel, and act the exact same regardless. It only matters to the self, and the new iteration will always feel as if their continuity is unbroken.