Lemmy.world reportedly bans people for being anti-Zionist. At the same time, numerous human rights organizations have documented that Zionist policies and actions amount to crimes against humanity (e.g., forced displacement, collective punishment, apartheid).
If banning opposition to crimes against humanity is itself anti-humanity, doesn’t that make lemmy.world complicit? How do you reconcile defending a platform that silences critics while atrocities continue?
It’s depend of the “alternative opinion”. Factually wrong get downvote and length response, different opinion just length response, regurgitate propaganda get comment removed, “I’m right because I’m white” is ban.