Lemmy.world reportedly bans people for being anti-Zionist. At the same time, numerous human rights organizations have documented that Zionist policies and actions amount to crimes against humanity (e.g., forced displacement, collective punishment, apartheid).
If banning opposition to crimes against humanity is itself anti-humanity, doesn’t that make lemmy.world complicit? How do you reconcile defending a platform that silences critics while atrocities continue?


Potentially your only half-decent example of what was requested by the other user (assuming the act was indeed committed by an anti-zionist).
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
Honestly, seems like the work of a bad-faith Zionist.
For all we know, the nursing home committed malpractice leading to the death of a tenant or something. This story is tantamount to hearsay.
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
For all we know, the man was sporing the Israeli flag. This story is tantamount to hearsay.
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
Honestly, seems like the work of a bad-faith Zionist.
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
What does this have to do with anti-zionism?
Honestly, seems like the work of a bad-faith Zionist.