I often see these words used interchangeably, though as I understand it there is a difference between the two ideologies, no?

  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    dude it took years for anyone to get a car. months to get household appliances shortages of basic things like office supplies were common outside of the government, etc

    it was shit outside of military production, because basically it all went to military production.

    • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      They didn’t want to have private cars, public transit is much more efficient and more pro-social. People wanted cars, so they gave them cars, but the cars were pretty bare-bones and it took a long time to get one.

      They did have plenty of issues, and yes, they spent a huge proportion of their industrial capacity on the military. Do you wonder why they spent so much on the military? Because they were heckin’ bad authoritarians? Or maybe it might have something to do with having been invaded and losing 27 million people, and then immediately have their former allies turn on them and become openly hostile immediately after the war.