spoiler

Personally? No, absolutely not. There should be no differentiating between what can be measured, and what cannot.

I can’t help but look at the reproducibility issue in “Psychology” and notice, what did they do about it? Nothing. It just exists. It’s not real science.

  • disregardable@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you refuse to consider anything other than randomized control trials science, then you believe we don’t have proof that smoking causes cancer.