cm0002@lemy.lol to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 3 days agoI'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck offlemy.lolimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down110
arrow-up1494arrow-down1imageI'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck offlemy.lolcm0002@lemy.lol to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 3 days agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squarejnod4@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWhat if half of our ISP bill went to subsidy websites based solely on how many megabytes/GBs you’re using towards or from a certain source.
minus-squareGobbel2000@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoI get the idea, but it seems hardly reasonable to pay companies for the bandwidth they use. Wouldn’t that incentivize wasting bandwidth?
minus-squarejnod4@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI can foresee a news website sending me gigabyte websites just to cheat the system. This is the part where the system breaks down
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoMaybe the opposite would work: serve the same content as the competitors with lower data.
What if half of our ISP bill went to subsidy websites based solely on how many megabytes/GBs you’re using towards or from a certain source.
I get the idea, but it seems hardly reasonable to pay companies for the bandwidth they use. Wouldn’t that incentivize wasting bandwidth?
I can foresee a news website sending me gigabyte websites just to cheat the system. This is the part where the system breaks down
Maybe the opposite would work: serve the same content as the competitors with lower data.