• PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been using it as a sort of litmus test for AI images. Even at a high quality setting, AVIF compresses them down to almost nothing.
    Something to do with the lack of natural “jitter” in AI images and the way AVIF has been designed to perfectly deal with this.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh guess the AI folks haven’t yet realized that you can increase perceived accuracy by adding a small amount of random noise.

      Which of course they didn’t, because then they’d need to understand some things about images instead of just throwing whatever data they can find at it and hoping it figures it all out from that.

      Though I’m not sure how much it applies to images, as the examples I’ve seen were audio. But it’s cool to hear a low bitrate audio sample of someone talking unintelligibly and then play that same clip with random noise also playing and suddenly you can understand what is being said.

    • qqq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The diffusion models at least were basically designed to “remove noise from a random image until a real image emerged” so that actually makes a lot of sense, interesting