Title…
I’m kinda disgusted with Microsoft and Github has been declining into an AI-Centric hellhole, to the point my recommendations are almost exclusively AI related… And let’s not forget, the new Copilot Training enabled by default (which honestly, how do you get rid of this thing, VSCode also feels intrusive with AI-First bullshittery)
I’ve been wondering about moving to Gitlab but… “Finally, AI for the entire software lifecycle.” is literally plastered in the landing page. So… that feels like a no-go.
Codeberg is very decent, it’s based on Forgejo so ActivityPub is also a thing (but is cross-instance contributions possible?) but it’s exclusive for Source-Available and Free Projects, which, by all means, totally fine! Half of my “active” projects are for free, and are open source (does that make them FOSS even though I’m basically the only dev?)
And last but not least, Forgejo and Gitlab themselves are self-hostable, but…how expensive (price and storage) would it be to self host a Git Forge??
And maybe I’m being narrow-sighted… For FOSS projects in Github, sadly I’ll have no choice but to contribute there, if that’s the only place where the project resides, same for Gitlab, and Codeberg* (unless cross-instance contrib is a thing)
For now, I’m thinking of moving FOSS/OSS projects to Codeberg, but for personal projects? What are some good options?
I self host gitea and have a script that mirrors any GitHub repo that I star. Super useful.
I fork from my own mirror in gitea if I want to tinker. Keeps me from having a GitHub presence at all unless I’m contributing upstream.
I have a bare private git repo on my homeland server. Not great for sharing my work but great for personal projects.
Gitea is completely worth it, easy to setup, minimal effort. Many benefits, though I did it for automation with Actions. Such a time saver.
If you are looking for something ready made i recommend looking into git.gay they run a pretty good service over there
For personal projects you can either just use git locally or make them source-available with a restrictive license. If you don’t even want the source to be available then why use a public repo?
Codeberg has been doing awesome things, and they maintain an open source self-hostable forge called Forgejo.
I’m in the process of moving all of my repos over from GitHub to https://forge.sciactive.com/, my own Forgejo instance.
Did not realize these were the same thing and the have my own forgejo install.
I’ve just recently discovered your sciactive.com and I have to say I’m a fan!
Thank you. :)
What about non-foss collaboration? (Ie Game Dev)
I mean you can have private repos.
Codeberg has limited private repos though which i assume is what they were referring to.
100MB limit
Not if you self-host.
You can set up a git server with minimal fuss, just a bit of ssh-ing. Unless you need a gui for some reason.
If the Devs can use terminal and git natively then you just need an Ubuntu server and space for the files. Git is just ssh u derbthe hood. There’s a page on the git site showing how to set it up. I was very pleased how easy it was.
It’s super easy to host your own. You could probably spin up a server on a VPS for like $5 a month.
Sourcehut allows private repos. Alternatively id look into a self hosted forgejo instance you control.
And many people overlook it but git has its own webui.
Everyone here has fancy answers and I just back my stuff up to bare repos on an external hard drive. Now I’m starting to question that…
You can host Gitea or gitweb
i would love to see gitea gain prominence over github
Don’t overcomplicate things just to fit in with strangers on the internet.
It’s genuinely a breath of fresh air when people choose pragmatism over conformity.
Don’t put words in my mouth. I don’t do things just because of peer pressure.
No need to get snarky with the person who is actually saying positive things to you.
If you pick a FOSS license then your project is FOSS. The number of developers doesn’t matter.
I moved all my (meager bullshit) personal projects to Codeberg awhile ago. My stuff was already open source, but I did explicitly add some license files I neglected to add before just to make it clear. So far so good.
Before you archive your Github repos make sure to update them with one last commit explaining that the repo has moved to somewhere else (and potentially why). Once you lock the repo you can’t make changes. If you straight-up delete them then this isn’t an issue.
Or my own personal server.
Hell yea
Note - you can completely disable all the AI features in Gitlab. In fact, they’re disabled by default unless you explicitly enable them by configuring model integrations. I think its one of the better self hosted options because it had a clear maintenance and path to profitability.
I run my own GitLab on a NUC with no issues.
Disclaimer: I have contributed open source code to GitLab before.
Yeah, AI in GitLab is nowhere to be found except the about page.
I’ve been using it for ten years now and have no intention to move.
Most people seem to go for either codeberg or gitlab as alternatives
Codeberg works for me. I used to use a couple of indie instances of gitea for various smaller project, but both have either gone down or been at risk, so I mostly use Codeberg which is more organized and failsafe.
Codeburg
For personal projects I’ve just got a VPS where me and a couple of partners in crime push over ssh. It’s very informal and merges are requested in our group chat.
At my previous place of employment we selfhosted gitlab. I much prefer that over corporate github. I want my own fork, not a shared repo.
