I mean, I just don’t really understand how lawyers can defend rapists, child predators, murderers, etc. I think I would have to have a moral line somewhere.
I mean, I just don’t really understand how lawyers can defend rapists, child predators, murderers, etc. I think I would have to have a moral line somewhere.
The question presumes that providing defense for someone that is guilty is more of an ethical problem than prosecuting someone that is innocent.
I believe the opposite. I think even if someone is guilty they deserve a fair defense.