Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.
Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?
So having a chief and leader is anarchy?? ok bud
I am pretty certain from your response you do not understand their hierarchy or their culture. But please tell me more about what you know if anarchy.
Too much angst, not enough pragmatic life experience. Better go watch SLC Punk! again.