• vole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      21 hours ago

      A developer submitted a PR code change for systemd userdb.

      My proposals (that’s really what PRs are) are to implement a solution that meets the regulatory requirements in several jurisdictions by providing a way to store a self-reported birthdate locally on the machine. These laws also require that this date is collected during account creation (hence why I made PRs against installers) and you can enter any value here, even January 1st, 1900. There is no proof required, no ID scanning, and no external tracking. Nor do I have any desire for that to ever change.

      Apparently the developer is confirmed to be just a regular guy. He thinks it’d be worse if every desktop environment implements their own solution to comply with these laws. He’s against the various laws related to this incident.

      As a fallout for submitting this pull request, he has been extensively harassed. His personal information being repeatedly posted online; his information used to sign up to a lot of sites, groups, churches, car dealerships, ordering food for him; threats of murder; regular textual harassment.

      • ExoticCherryPigeon@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Deserves, the change is garbage, it affects so few people and now the rest of us have this option to be forced to use it at a later date. garbage human. Most of linux users will not be touched by any of this garbage law. i am rather militant over this

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 minutes ago

          Yes, the dev deserves to be harassed and receive literal death threats because checks notes he added a completely optional field.

          Grow the fuck up.

      • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        He thinks it’d be worse if every desktop environment implements their own solution to comply with these laws.

        Sure he has a point there, but putting it in systemd means there will need to be at least one other implementation for systems that don’t use systemd…

          • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I’m not suggesting anything specific. But the point of rushing to implement your way into software A to prevent each software having their own implementation does not make sense to me. This is not a proper way to standardise. There are many months left to make a proposal that works for everyone.