And it’s not even using Apple’s fastest phone chip.

  • u_tamtam@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    to be fair, that wouldn’t be my pick at that pricepoint. That single-core performance would still be unmatched, but I would have something with better IO, more RAM, and more life in it.

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      the issue with this product is that it is not the right product for most people that discuss technology online, but it is still a great product for tons of people

      • u_tamtam@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Hard disagree, the more you look at it, the more this can be described as “a product to convince people that discuss technology online that this is a product for tons of people”. Most people need HDMI more than they need record-matching single-thread performance. Most people need more RAM because almost all they do is web-based and not MacOS native. Most people need I/O because they have mice, weird peripherals, and tons of usb drives, mostly USB-A.

        That said, it’s a magnificent second or third device for the tech elite that’s already committed to the Apple ecosystem (having nothing on-device, whose peripherals and I/O needs are covered by more general-purpose computers) and who will absolutely brag that the performance of this lets them do lots of coding (using it as a metric for what a good computer is, in their eyes). Strangely both things can be true at the same time!