da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoOOP is a construct of oppression installed by the burgoisefeddit.orgimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1644arrow-down115
arrow-up1629arrow-down1imageOOP is a construct of oppression installed by the burgoisefeddit.orgda_cow (she/her)@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoI skimmed that. So you’ve got a bunch of message transceivers (aka objects). And the magic is in the message soup. Yes?
minus-squareZombieChicken@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoFrom my understanding, yes. Personally, I’ve seen so many different definitions of “OOP” (most of which were incoherent), I developed my own definition of what an ‘object’ is, and just go on with life.
I skimmed that.
So you’ve got a bunch of message transceivers (aka objects). And the magic is in the message soup.
Yes?
From my understanding, yes. Personally, I’ve seen so many different definitions of “OOP” (most of which were incoherent), I developed my own definition of what an ‘object’ is, and just go on with life.