洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agoHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.orgexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.org洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoSo what is the case we are speaking about? “Hey LLM, write the OS kernel that is fully compatible with Linux, designed like Linux, uses the same algorithms as Linux and the same code style as Linux”?
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoIf you have Linux in the training data, the outcome if at all remotely useful would likely include plagiarism.
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoThere are cases in the wild of LLMs straight up pasting the GPL into files unprompted.
So what is the case we are speaking about? “Hey LLM, write the OS kernel that is fully compatible with Linux, designed like Linux, uses the same algorithms as Linux and the same code style as Linux”?
If you have Linux in the training data, the outcome if at all remotely useful would likely include plagiarism.
Are there similar cases in the wild?
There are cases in the wild of LLMs straight up pasting the GPL into files unprompted.