洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agoHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.orgexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.org洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoPlagiarism is a form of copyright infringement if there are substantial similarities. Open source licenses build on top of intellectual property laws.
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoSo, everything depends on how you define substantial similarities. My opinion is that if there are no copy-and-pasted chunks of code (except for trivial), there are no substantial similarities.
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_similarity
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoI live in another country, however the idea is the same as I wrote above: this all is about direct copying.
Plagiarism is a form of copyright infringement if there are substantial similarities.
Open source licenses build on top of intellectual property laws.
So, everything depends on how you define substantial similarities. My opinion is that if there are no copy-and-pasted chunks of code (except for trivial), there are no substantial similarities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_similarity
I live in another country, however the idea is the same as I wrote above: this all is about direct copying.