• anake@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Capitalism is inherently incompatible with statelessness. You need some kind of police or military force to enforce private property and contracts. In anarcho-capitalism, that force doesn’t disappear. Those with more money would be able to buy more protection, better courts, and stronger enforcement, they would increasingly turn wealth directly into power.

    What we understand as a corporation today wouldn’t vanish without the state; it would reappear as large, hierarchical firms held together by contracts, private security, and internal command structures. In practice, these would look less like free associations and more like dictatorial private governments, exercising control over workers and communities without even minimal public accountability.

    Removing legal tender laws or corporate charters doesn’t eliminate capitalism’s core dynamics: private ownership of productive resources, wage labor, and profit extraction. Anarcho-capitalism keeps those intact while stripping away any collective checks on them. From an anarchist anti-capitalist perspective, that’s not anarchism, thats straight up the replacement of public authority with unaccountable private power.

    • AfterNova@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How do enforce a lack of private property without a state? How do you prevent a capitalist system from sprouting up in socialism without a state?

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Same way animals do. You don’t need to enforce something that doesn’t exist in the first place.

        If there’s no state to stop me from building a garden on some billionaire’s ranch, private property no longer exists.