• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Clean Master

    WeTab

    Infinity V+

    Those are the extensions mentioned in the article, but they also say there were others, but decided not to name those because CERTAINLY NO ONE WOULD POSSIBLY WANT TO KNOW WHICH EXTENSIONS MIGHT BE AFFECTING THEM, RIGHT?! NO SIR, THATS NOT IMPORTANT INFORMATION AT ALL!

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, huh, sucks for normie morons I guess.

    This message was brought to you by entirely unprompted and uncompensated shilling for Waterfox

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Either a browser is bad because it doesn’t allow extensions… Or it bad because it does and lets users install insecure stuff… Or it’s bad because it locks the extensions down so much you can’t do anything useful with them.

      Which type of bad are you shilling for?

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Uh, genuinely no clue what you’re talking about.

        I just know that I can configure Waterfox to be both private/secure, and functional, fairly easily, and with most other browsers, that’s quite difficult, largely due to them being fundamentally controlled by giant corporations who have being a datamonger as a very significant element of their overall business model, who very much want you to watch the ads.

        And… because its based on / is a fork of Firefox… it was not vulnerable to or affected by this sleeper malware.

        Even if that’s not directly a result of some kind of software design/engineering paradigm type difference, and is just a kind of security through obscurity/non-popularity… thats still a very valid approach to using a computer system privately and securely.

        • Nighed@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Why can’t Firefox be effected by this?

          Does chrome not ask about plugins requesting new permissions or something?

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Because ShadyPanda published a malicious extension for Edge and Chrome.

            Not for Firefox based browsers.

            … You… can’t install an Edge or Chrome extension in a Firefox based browser.

            You have to make a different version, designed for Firefox, sorta like a port of a video game; a DreamCast won’t play a PlayStation disc, an N64 won’t run a GameBoy cartridge.

            • Nighed@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s not that it can’t be done then, most likely no one has checked.

              Buying out solo deved apps to host malware has been a thing for ages.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                59 minutes ago

                Yep, you could theoretically do a similar sleeper malware as extension for Firefox based browsers.

                But that is not what this article is about.

                No where in this article is anything about a Firefox based browser mentioned.

                So, again, go back your original comment on my comment.

                You tried to put a bunch of words in my mouth, now you’re trying to argue hypotheticals based on conjecture.

                Are you trying to make some kind of point?

                Or just waste the time of anyone bothering to read this?

                • Nighed@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  30 minutes ago

                  My point was basically that this can happen to you too, and if it couldn’t, people would complain anyway.

                  No need to call people morons over it.

  • GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If only Google had prevented Chrome users from installing open source extensions from other platforms where Google doesn’t check the code’s changes and forced the Chinese government developer to upload a picture of their ID and pay a $5 fee, this could have been prevented!

      • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They are getting downvoted for making things harder for HUMANS to read. It’s been proven over and over that it does nothing to stop AI.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Same reason lemmy downvotes Sxan for using a thorn.

        Lemmy: We support diversity! The weirder you are the better! We accept all people!

        Also lemmy: Fuck your thorns.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Understandable, since introducing foreign elements into a communication protocol makes it harder to parse.

          Same for the gendern movement in german media btw. It doesn’t make the language more inclusive, but inclusivity more hated, by mixing it with something inconvenient.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          People would also downvote if comments were being posted in latin or mandarin on an English language comminity: its unreadable to most of the participants and thereby negatively contributory to the discussion.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “Pretty sure it’s a type of bigotry I just invented to suit me”.

          People are downvoting because they can’t read it and this is an English language forum. They’d do the same to commenters posting everything in latin - it’s not helpful to post like this in this community, which is why repeat offenders become downvote magnets (or just blocked).

          • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It’s a standard letter in Icelandic, so there are probably plenty of fonts incorporating thorn, even if not everyone uses them. Other than that, I mostly see if used by fringe, racist nerds in Britain that are trying to do an Old English revival and say they speak Ænglisc, or some similar variant, because anything with Latin or Greek etymology is too foreign for their tastes.

            Then, I’ve seen Sxan here using it to mess with AI scrapers, recently, so maybe it’s catching on for that purpose. Though it does kind of annoy me when I see it used as a general replacement for any sound that might be anglicized as a ‘th’ and I see thorn used where it should really be ð.