iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 hours agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1505arrow-down155
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 hours agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squareFrankDeath@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agohttps://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·54 minutes agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.