Recently I was locked out of my own Ghost blog platform because they decided they were going to add Email 2FA. I also cannot add any other authors because that requires email verification.

Today I was looking at installing Bonfire and came across this:

Bonfire requires working email for user signups, password resets, and notifications. Most installations will need email configuration before the instance is usable.

Setting up email is a pain in the ass, costs money, is dependent on 3rd parties, violates privacy, and is just completely unnecessary. Why wouldn’t you give users the option to not use it? It’s infuriating!

  • artyom@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    So, please tell me why a developer should focus their time doing that rather than building the core features of the app.

    It’s a whole lot less work than configuring email.

    How much work do you think it is to add a toggle that makes email optional?

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s a whole lot less work than configuring email.

      It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than just using a robust, reliable, resilient, widely supported good old SMTP. For you it might be easier to input your account (which at least on XMPP resemble quite a bit of email address) but for the developer it’s totally different thing. Also practically everyone accessing a website has an email address and if they’d decide to support some mesaging platform it’d make more sense to use whatsapp than XMPP since it’s vastly more popular.

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than just using a robust, reliable, resilient, widely supported good old SMTP

        For the minimal of sending out a message to their accounts, they are just as easy as each other. Heck, there are simple packages to send XMPP messages from the CLI.

      • artyom@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than…SMTP

        It’s absolutely not.

        it’d make more sense to use whatsapp

        It’d make far less sense considering both the fact that it’s a Meta-owned proprietary data collection and advertising product, and also that they simply don’t support such a functionality.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than…SMTP

          It’s absolutely not.

          And you know this since you’ve written code to manage both on different environments, right?

          Also, whatsapp supports all kinds of “bots” and it has absolutely massive userspace compared to pretty much any other instant message application. It doesn’t matter if you create the perfect protocol and platform for this kind of thing if there’s 7 people globally using it.

          • artyom@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            And you know this since you’ve written code to manage both on different environments, right?

            You don’t have to write code to configure Matrix/XMPP.

            it has absolutely massive userspace

            You keep saying this as if user adoption is the only thing that matters. 99% of self-hosted stuff has tiny “userspace” so I don’t know what you’re on about.

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You don’t have to write code to configure Matrix/XMPP.

              You do realize that the developers need to write code to configure a Matrix/XMPP module? The module doesn’t just appear out your immagination.

              Then it will need to be maintained as security holes are discovered.

              Tell me again why developers should spend the time and resources to maintain a feature that at best will have a marginal impact on the userbase, over focusing on the core of the project.

            • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              How you imagine things send messages to reset your passwords, sending notifications and whatever is currently managed via email than some piece of code creating and sending messages, managing possible errors with them and potentially also monitoring/logging the message traffic for statistics or debugging?

              User adoption matters if you want your thing to be actually useful for the actual users. And supporting any messaging system requires effort, so it makes sense to spend limited resources on a thing which has the biggest userspace. If you want to run matrix server which has you and your dog using it, go ahead, but don’t be surprised if you want to contact your neighbor and he’ll look like you have two heads when you start to explain how to reach you.

              • artyom@piefed.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                so it makes sense to spend limited resources on a thing which has the biggest userspace

                It makes zero sense to spend any resources on adding compatibility with proprietary and malicious protocols, regardless of “userspace”.

                • stoy@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I had a look at the system, and it is a commercial product, I would imagine that their customers have requested these features.

                  Since you are a customer, why not request your features to be added as well?

                  Or, better yet, since you have explained that creating an XMPP/Matrix module as an alternative to email requires no coding, and the plattform is open source, why not just slap it together yourself?