- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Am public servant, so no. But if by ‘shareholders’ you mean the taxpaying public, then, hopefully, yes.
Gotta get that exceeds performance mark at the end of the year.
No, and I like it that way.
I am self-employed and as the sole shareholder I can confidently say “no”.
Shareholders hold the shares of the company, and not the shares of mine. So, they can go fuck themselves. Every act of mine is to generate value for myself, not for some rich fart.
Have you no compassion? Think of the poor desolute shareholders, they need you, they need your labour, it is your duty as a fellow human being to do everything to make their numbers go up is it not?
Working somewhere without a profit motive has done wonders for my mental health (at least re my job)
Like a non-profit or a coop?
Yes, this is key. Usually places without profit motive are serving the people in some capacity rather than serving the dollar.
God, I hope not
When we forge burgers at the restaurant foundry, we chant:
For the shareholders!!!
They share the hold!!!This comment gave me strong cloud atlas vibes with the Una-939 storyline
The answer is always ‘no’.
Or “only as a collateral effect of providing value for myself”.
Removed by mod
