Is this a faithful recreation of the version of Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement with 2 additional bottom levels?

  • Digit@lemmy.wtfOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Took a while to contemplate how mere contradiction could be fallacious. It could be:

    • semantic strawman.
    • bare assertion fallacy.
    • argument from ignorance fallacy.
    • false dilemma.
    • appeal to emotion.
    • moving goal posts.
    • circular reasoning.
    • non sequitur. (… ghadamn! I spelled that correctly for the first time! (thnx to another lemmy user correcting me last time.))
    • bandwaggon fallacy.
    • red herring.

    But, that was a good point to raise. On face value, it is at first difficult to see how mere contradiction can be fallacious.

    (And I confess, only the first of those I came up with entirely by my self. The others were suggested by an LLM, with examples which I’ve omitted for brevity.)

    • Digit@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Just had wild (early/incomplete) notion of constructing the 3D version, with fallacies on one side, the opposite(?) of the fallacies on the other side, and on the back side, sorta the opposite of the front side, like, concessions and retractions…

      Inspired by this context, and other comments here.