Recent news revealed that Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has been investing heavily in military tech companies, which adds another ethical layer to a platform already criticized for how little it pays musicians !

Spotify only pays artists about $3–5 per 1,000 streams, using a pro-rata model that directs most money toward major stars… By contrast, Qobuz (≈$18–20 per 1,000 streams) and Tidal (≈$12–13) pay far more fairly!

However Tidal is far from ethical. Most of its revenue is controlled by private investors and founders and small artists still earn very little…

More fair-minded platforms like Bandcamp, Resonate, Ampled, or SoundCloud’s fan-powered royalties prioritize musicians over investors.

With these more ethical alternatives available, why do we keep using Spotify?

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Lots of assumptions here.

    you got every assumption wrong.

    Zero assumptions here, you said you were, and I quote, “not seeking out new stuff”, I didn’t assume that.

    I’m subscribed to various music producers on YouTube

    So you DO enjoy streaming music…

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I hope you enjoyed feeling like you had a “gotcha” moment. When on my computer, yeah, I watch some YouTube, but mostly news and late-night monologues. I sure as shit don’t pay for it.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have no interest in “gotcha moments”. Just having a discussion about the virtues of streaming music platforms vs. buying.

        If you don’t pay for it then you are pirating, which is a whole other discussion.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          “If you don’t pay for it then you are pirating” is not a discussion, it’s an erroneous blanket statement.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        LOL your suggestion is that they said they’re subscribed to various producers but they don’t listen to them? Now that’s pedantic.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Being subscribed is not the same as listening. In fact, I use a Firefox add-on to specifically exclude what I’ve categorized as music. It is vanishingly rare that I turn that setting off.

          I strongly associate any given track with the mood I was in when I first heard it, and I’ve not been in anywhere near a good mood since the election, so listening to new stuff at this point would give it negative connotations that would forever follow that track around in my mind.

          So I stick with “college road trip” or “I just met my (ex-)wife” sorts of stuff. I don’t exercise or anything, and my earbuds are lost somewhere in my van. I rarely listen to music, period, because it reminds me of not being homeless.