• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I wonder how they managed to target these guys after previous attacks, both by Israel and the USA, appeared to be largely ineffective. Was it a serendipitous opportunity or does it reflect progress on establishing an intelligence network in Yemen?

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      very easily, previously these guys weren’t a target. asm launchers were, but these can get hidden in a cave rather quickly

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems ok to me. They need to distinguish between the opposing governments, and they’re reporting what the Houthis have said because they don’t have confirmation from trusted sources.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        They could simply say houthis government’s prime minister was assasinated by israel

        • AmidFuror@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They don’t know it. They’d have egg on their face if it turned out he wasn’t dead or died some other way.

          The choice to include that it was an airstrike instead of a gunshot, blade, poison, or a hand grenade is an editorial choice. It certainly answers one of the first questions which would form in the reader’s mind.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            My problem is x-backed. You never see that when refering to isrsel which is a proxy for american imperliasm