Saw people talking in comments at several places now, expressing animosity towards them to say the least, always presented as something that everyone seems to know about.

  • Winter_Oven@piefed.socialEnglish
    201·
    2 days ago

    Hmm, I would like to add on a couple of points to you reply (against your reply, now that I reread it):

    1. I feel that he really was 100 percent in opposition against the movement, no?
    2. About the movement, the creator of the movement also agrees that the movement can most probably not be applied to current games today, as it can be unfeasible for the exact same points you say, he wants it to be applied to future games being developed, by having the end of life of games be considered right from the beginning of games.
    3. Moreover, about the legislative part of it, doesn’t a petition not need to deal with the exact legal wording? I belived petitions to be more like “hey, this is what the idea is, and this many people support it”. More like a letter to like actual law makers that this is a problem, and we need laws regarding this problem. Then the clear and robust arguments for each of the (very valid, of course!) problems and caveats you mention will need to be clearly articulated by them.
    • RandomStickman@fedia.io
      222·
      2 days ago

      He has literally said on stream that he’s willing to actively campaign against SKG. While tbf he hasn’t actually done so beyond the 2 (ish) video that he’s done signalling his opposition. It’s 100% fair to say he opposes SKG.

      You have a better understanding of the movement now than the 2 top level commenters, OP.

      Edit: it is PirateSoftware’s spread of misinformation, as you’ve seen firsthand, and his refusal to redact any of it nor to talk with SKG’s organiser that drew many people’s ire. All these resurfaced again recently because SKG’s organiser made a video on the imminent failure of the EU petition and mentioned in the video that unfortunately PirateSoftware was the biggest voice that mentioned SKG.