Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-220 days agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down14
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-220 days agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-219 days agoSo conventional warfare?
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days agoYour premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.
So conventional warfare?
Your premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.