Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down14
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoThe treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about. The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoThat’s foolproof?
The treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about.
The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
That’s foolproof?