I guess it really makes a difference how you’re having an argument. Generally irl, arguments would be more logical as it is easy to determine if there is sarcasm involved, etc.
Online it may be hard to determine the writers intent, and some may just dismiss the writers comment. This aspect might be the reason why arguments online are so ferocious.
To answer this, no they are not perfectly rational. However they are not dumb, anyone can be a rapist, it is a mental disorder which doesn’t correlate with their IQ.
The ‘tons of reasons’ statement would be interesting to read about, as usually a perpetrators focus is rape and escape. Not befriending the victim - i might suggest how inconsistent this sounds.
Unless the victim has other mental problems then this could occur. However, I was simply seeking an answer, not an explosive statement.
The question was why he didn’t do it sooner. Not when confronted.
If he knew he did something wrong, illegal, and immoral then why did he stay and wait until the victim wakes up.
Thanks for replying. I do see that there is some incompatibility with both our proof. However, I do realise that you’re talking about perpetrators which are close to the victim - and that may yield a different response to that of a random person/ newly met person.
Suffice to say, it does make sense that persons closest to the victim would be the perpetrator.
I don’t know if he wants to be called bean anymore… as now he shall be called grape.
[Article answers second paragraph]
Thought that an exclaimer will work for some ignorant people but that’s how stuff works.
And I am also interested of why are you so deliberated of calling this ‘stupid shit’, and ‘awful take’? I know I have put it in words wrong and next time I’ll do it better, but I assure you fail to read and understand my comment first.
I’ll refrain from deleting this as I know there are people who understand what I wrote.
Oh sorry forgot the question mark there. My bad.
Hi, to answer your question I’d like to ask what convoluted reason did I state?
It’s nice to see you replied to my comment, and the last part of my comment was just a question which I am confused about.
And sorry for coming across as not believing. You could consider that serious accusations shouldn’t be based on beliefs - but facts.
Thanks for highlighting the parts of the article. Certainly answers some questions I had. The thing that can be said is that there isn’t clinical proof of the sexsomnia. So there is a low chance of her having it.
The man may have raped her. however, why didn’t he run away sooner? Usually perpetrators escape after the abuse (asking a question).
[Article answers second paragraph]
Interesting. The situation really puts into perspective how both genders have it difficult. It can really rule out anything, if the man really raped her, the woman caused a fake accusation or it was just a big misunderstanding.
Firstly, the woman who was suspected to have sexsomnia, did she really have sexsomnia? And what evidence did the research facility produce?
Secondly, the man who is blamed to have raped her, if consent was given while she was deemed as fully awake, then why is this situation occurring? Did he fail to realise she is not fully awake?
[Unrecognised file format]
COPPA is a joke sometimes, they don’t really protect and like other American orgs it probably is lobbied.
The best case would be to protect everyone’s privacy, not just the children OR teens. And if they wanted to help then they would’ve outlined other orgs like Facebook - but that’s an American org.
I agree, this situation is twisted on both sides. Additionally this situation seems like non-statutory rape which makes the 1 year sentence quite lenient.
Yep agreed. Everyone’s views are different, and there is definitively going to be some opposition.
Unfortunately still doesn’t explain what to do when you’re covered in piss 😔
Somebody has to do a kitler version of this
They even capitalised the NUMBERS
Trends like this is like trickle down economics. If the adults find fun in using it the teens will use it, and then the children will catch on. I would argue it being illegal also encourages minors to get it; so even If they enforced it better, there would be people willing to take risks.
Damn what’s up with that guy
Different kinds of alcohol is just different flavours of hand sanitiser.