

Listen, I hate to defend republicans here, but your comment implies that all of them are pedophiles and that’s just not true. They all may be fucked up in some way or another, but even republicans dislike pedophiles.
Listen, I hate to defend republicans here, but your comment implies that all of them are pedophiles and that’s just not true. They all may be fucked up in some way or another, but even republicans dislike pedophiles.
I read it as in “is considering distributing…” and was VERY confused.
And calling people that get another animal heartless isn’t?
Anyway, it was meant as a commentary on how people can grieve but still get new pets. I wasn’t commanding them to grieve this way. Maybe “you gotta” was a poor choice of words.
I never said anywhere that anybody needed to take on another pet. All I said was, essentially, it’s okay to do and people aren’t heartless for doing it.
You gotta move on through the grief, accept that they’re no longer with you, but that you gave them the best life you could. And maybe realize that giving another pet a good life doesn’t mean you’re replacing or forgetting your last one. Some people are just better at it than others, they aren’t being heartless.
That said, people who get a new dog a week or two after their previous one died are insane to me. That just feels disrespectful.
He hordes more wealth than almost anyone else in the entire world. The man could fucking cure cancer and I would still hate him and consider him a horrible person. Nobody needs or deserves that much money when so much of the word is struggling to get by. And nobody makes that much money without exploiting others.