• 3abas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Let’s pretend the Queen of England didn’t just finally fuck off or all the other female authoritarians/war criminals, let’s remove her agency and attribute any good she does to being a woman.

    It’s more sexist than the implication itself.

    • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Margaret Thatcher was UK’s Reagan. Everything she didn’t ruin herself; she readied to be ruined later.

      It wasn’t because she was a woman. It was because she was a freaking neoliberal.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It’s also just really fucking annoying that this platitude comes up every time a headline is posted about a woman doing good, as if people are just incapable of thinking it through.

      Neither Clinton nor Harris would have supported this, and in fact, they’d have told their rotating villains to oppose it and claimed powerlessness, as Dems always do. (Which is, in part, why they lost their elections.)

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I personally think they care way more about losing money and influence than hating women.

      The misogyny is just a side gig.