• Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Having friends in Lebanon, I feel obligated to check the channels for updates. It’s true. Reuters is complicit for framing it this way

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The past few years there was a great “purge” of journalists that were publicly against the genocide with the excuse that the news outlets needed to stay independent (this was at Reuters and AP news). Because being against genocide is equated with supporting Hamas.

      But while those who protested the genocide were fired, those supporting the genocide were simply supporting a country against terrorism, and so they remained.

      And you can see how apparent that is in the language used by most media outlets.

      • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Not just the past few years, since the invention of Israel, all the biggest news agencies purge staff reporting on them every few years

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Because being against genocide is equated with supporting Hamas.

        “Neutral” is when you don’t say anything bad about the home team and you don’t say anything good about the away team.