• aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    21 hours ago

    designed to deter companies from becoming involved in a proposed West Bank settlement that would split the territory in two

    Not deter Israel from stealing more territory, just deter companies from participating.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It is not clear if the UK will go so far as to ban trade with illegal settlements.

      I trust that they will be sending a strongly worded letter declaring that this new settlement is unacceptable, before accepting it.

  • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Lip service. With no actual sanctions on the state itself or ceasing to send weapons and components, then it’ll be more useless than the paper it’s written on.

      • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When there’s a case of genocide being investigated, the UK would like to say that they did all they can to prevent it. All while the beat and outlaw protests against the genocide.

        It’s OK to call out the hypocrisy.

        Or do you want me to clap for them like a trained monkey and say “what a great step in the right direction”?

      • mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Better use maximum leaverage. Cuba style sanctions on israel. No selling or buying weapons to/from israel